Custody
Who controls the keys and where counterparty or operating risk sits.
Answer six questions about security practices, not wallet secrets. You will get a prioritized, explainable action list without a score or a claim that your setup is safe.
Six-question reviewBitcoin risk is not one number. This assessment separates control of keys from backup durability, recovery practice, access protection, payment verification, and continuity planning.
Who controls the keys and where counterparty or operating risk sits.
Whether recovery material is verified and resilient to one failure.
Whether the restoration process has been tested under controlled conditions.
How wallet-related devices and custodial accounts resist takeover.
How destination and amount details are checked before approval.
Whether trusted people can respond to incapacity or death without guessing.
Each answer maps to a documented qualitative finding. Findings are ordered by action priority; they are not combined into a numerical rating.
A short browser questionnaire cannot inspect your devices, confirm a backup, model every attacker, or account for legal and personal circumstances.
Choose the answer closest to your current practice. Do not choose the answer you plan to implement later.
Use the broad safety map when you need context, or open the closest specialist guide for the next action.
Trace 12 custody threats to controls, expected evidence, residual risks, and primary sources using stable public IDs.
Separate network, price, custody, scam, transaction, backup, and inheritance risk before choosing a control.
Connect custody, backups, access control, transaction verification, recovery, and continuity into one process.
Understand what recovery material restores, what device failure changes, and what must be tested beforehand.